10 songs that feel like That's Not Me
Matched to That's Not Me by The Beach Boys on how the music actually moves — intensity, dynamic swing, texture, tempo — not by genre tag. Here's what makes each one a match.
A 99% feel-match — carries the same feel and lands at almost exactly the same energy (36/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (120 BPM).
96% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (41/100). Same smooth texture.
Keeps the same nostalgic pull — runs a little hotter at 49/100. Measured 85% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (118 BPM).
Measures 87% the same. It runs a little hotter at 45/100.
A 87% feel-match — carries the same nostalgic pull and runs a little hotter at 44/100.
85% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it runs a little hotter at 49/100.
Keeps the same nostalgic pull — runs a little hotter at 49/100. Measured 85% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (120 BPM).
Measures 84% the same. It runs a little hotter at 47/100.
A 92% feel-match — carries the same introspective pull and runs a little hotter at 44/100. Nearly the same tempo, too (125 BPM).
94% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (39/100). Same smooth texture.
Frequently asked
What songs sound like “That's Not Me” by The Beach Boys?
The closest feel-matches we measure are “The Tempo Marches On” by Jim Gill, “Feel So Close” by Calvin Harris, “Advice for the Young at Heart” by Tears for Fears — the top match scores 99% alike. Matching is by how the songs actually move (intensity, dynamic range, texture, tempo, predictability, vocal force), not by genre tag or popularity.
How intense is “That's Not Me”?
It measures 37/100 on our intensity scale, computed from a dynamic range of 4/10, smooth texture, mild sudden shifts, and dynamic vocals. Tempo is 122 BPM.
How do you decide which songs are similar?
Every song in our catalog is measured on 8 dimensions — intensity, dynamic range, tempo, sudden changes, texture, predictability, vocal force and fine sound detail. Similarity is the distance between two songs across those measurements, so matches cross genres and eras. Shared mood tags break ties.
By the numbers: how this song compares
Computed from this song’s place among the 19,209 songs we’ve measured.
Where it sits in 19,000 songs
On our 19k-song scale this lands in the middle band — more energetic than 25% of songs, calmer than the other 75%. Its intensity reading of 37/100 comes from a dynamic range of 4/10, smooth texture, mild shifts, and dynamic vocals. It shares this stretch of the spectrum with thousands of other tracks, so the finer fingerprint below is what really separates it.
What makes it unusual
What stands out most about this song is an unusually steady, even volume: more extreme on that axis than 97% of everything we've measured. At the far opposite end of the library sit the songs built on full chaos — sudden changes, huge quiet-to-loud swings, and relentless energy — the kind of track this one is the counterpoint to.
Feels almost identical to
Closest matches by feel across all 19,209 measured songs — not by genre or artist, by how they actually move.
What it’s good for
Scored from this song’s tempo, intensity, dynamics and texture — not crowd votes.
1966 in context
The 166 songs we’ve measured from 1966 average a dynamic range of 6.4/10. At 4/10, this track is gentler and steadier than its year.
Mixes smoothly with
Within a few BPM and close in feel — they flow without a jarring transition.
The fingerprint
The 8-dimension measurement behind every rating on this page.
Want the single closest match, with every dimension compared?
Find its sonic twin →