← Back to Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2)
10 songs that feel like Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2)
Matched to Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2) by Radiohead on how the music actually moves — intensity, dynamic swing, texture, tempo — not by genre tag. Here's what makes each one a match.
A 96% feel-match — carries the same cathartic pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (70/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (148 BPM).
95% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (68/100). Same layered texture.
Keeps the same energetic pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (66/100). Measured 99% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (140 BPM).
Measures 94% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (64/100). Same layered texture.
A 99% feel-match — carries the same introspective pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (65/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (137 BPM).
94% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Same layered texture.
Keeps the same cathartic pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Measured 94% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (136 BPM).
Measures 94% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Same layered texture.
A 96% feel-match — carries the same cathartic pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (140 BPM).
96% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Same layered texture.
…and if you want it calmer
Same feeling, measured gentler — for when Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2) is more than you want right now.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but nothing in it lurches or startles. Intensity 45/100, down from 66.
Nothing in it lurches or startles, so it lands at 27/100 — the pull without the edge.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while it stays in our safe band start to finish. Reads 41/100.
Holds the same feel while its dynamic range stays a gentler 5 where the original climbs to 7. 24/100, versus the original's 66.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but its dynamic range stays a gentler 5 where the original climbs to 7. Intensity 25/100, down from 66. Nearly the same tempo, too.
It stays in our safe band start to finish, so it lands at 34/100 — the pull without the edge. Nearly the same tempo, too.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while it stays in our safe band start to finish. Reads 34/100.
Holds the same feel while nothing in it lurches or startles. 28/100, versus the original's 66.
Frequently asked
What songs sound like “Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2)” by Radiohead?
The closest feel-matches we measure are “Life and How to Live It” by R.E.M., “Cowgirl in the Sand” by Neil Young, “Jack Straw” by Grateful Dead — the top match scores 96% alike. Matching is by how the songs actually move (intensity, dynamic range, texture, tempo, predictability, vocal force), not by genre tag or popularity.
What songs are like “Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2)” but calmer?
“Jump” by Madonna, “The Times They Are a-Changin'” by Bob Dylan, “Monday Morning” by Fleetwood Mac keep a similar feel while measuring gentler — lower dynamic swing, fewer sudden shifts, or a calmer overall level.
How intense is “Polyethylene (Parts 1 and 2)”?
It measures 66/100 on our intensity scale, computed from a dynamic range of 7/10, layered texture, moderate sudden shifts, and dynamic vocals. Tempo is 140 BPM.
How do you decide which songs are similar?
Every song in our catalog is measured on 8 dimensions — intensity, dynamic range, tempo, sudden changes, texture, predictability, vocal force and fine sound detail. Similarity is the distance between two songs across those measurements, so matches cross genres and eras. Shared mood tags break ties.
By the numbers: how this song compares
Computed from this song’s place among the 19,209 songs we’ve measured.
Where it sits in 19,000 songs
This is one of the more intense things in our library — more energetic than 87% of the 19,209 songs we've measured. Its intensity reading of 66/100 comes from a dynamic range of 7/10, layered texture, moderate shifts, and dynamic vocals. Relatively few songs occupy this exact corner of the spectrum.
What makes it unusual
What stands out most about this song is a fast, driving tempo: more extreme on that axis than 90% of everything we've measured. At the far opposite end of the library sit the songs built on near-total stillness — steady volume, no surprises, a slow and unhurried pulse — the kind of track this one is the counterpoint to.
Feels almost identical to
Closest matches by feel across all 19,209 measured songs — not by genre or artist, by how they actually move.
What it’s good for
Scored from this song’s tempo, intensity, dynamics and texture — not crowd votes.
1997 in context
The 389 songs we’ve measured from 1997 average a dynamic range of 6.6/10. At 7/10, this track is right in line with its year.
Mixes smoothly with
Within a few BPM and close in feel — they flow without a jarring transition.
The fingerprint
The 8-dimension measurement behind every rating on this page.
Want the single closest match, with every dimension compared?
Find its sonic twin →