← Back to Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two
10 songs that feel like Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two
Matched to Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two by King Crimson on how the music actually moves — intensity, dynamic swing, texture, tempo — not by genre tag. Here's what makes each one a match.
A 89% feel-match — carries the same chaotic pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (74/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (140 BPM).
96% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (65/100). Same complex texture.
Keeps the same cathartic pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (65/100). Measured 96% alike. Nearly the same tempo, too (140 BPM).
Measures 96% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (65/100). Same complex texture.
A 96% feel-match — carries the same cathartic pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (69/100). Nearly the same tempo, too (140 BPM).
94% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it lands at almost exactly the same energy (67/100). Same complex texture.
Keeps the same cathartic pull — lands at almost exactly the same energy (66/100). Measured 92% alike.
Measures 96% the same. It lands at almost exactly the same energy (65/100). Same complex texture.
A 95% feel-match — carries the same intense pull and lands at almost exactly the same energy (66/100).
90% match across our 8 measured dimensions; it runs a little hotter at 76/100. Same complex texture.
…and if you want it calmer
Same feeling, measured gentler — for when Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two is more than you want right now.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but it eases off just enough to take the edge off. Intensity 86/100, down from 69. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Its dynamic range stays a gentler 6 where the original climbs to 9, so it lands at 50/100 — the pull without the edge.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while its dynamic range stays a gentler 7 where the original climbs to 9. Reads 54/100.
Holds the same feel while its dynamic range stays a gentler 7 where the original climbs to 9. 55/100, versus the original's 69. Nearly the same tempo, too.
Keeps the same feel of the original, but its dynamic range stays a gentler 7 where the original climbs to 9. Intensity 60/100, down from 69.
Its dynamic range stays a gentler 7 where the original climbs to 9, so it lands at 59/100 — the pull without the edge.
If it's the same feel you're after, this delivers it while its dynamic range stays a gentler 7 where the original climbs to 9. Reads 53/100.
Holds the same feel while its dynamic range stays a gentler 6 where the original climbs to 9. 49/100, versus the original's 69.
Frequently asked
What songs sound like “Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two” by King Crimson?
The closest feel-matches we measure are “Civilization Day” by Ornette Coleman, “Round Trip” by Ornette Coleman, “Out to Lunch” by Eric Dolphy — the top match scores 89% alike. Matching is by how the songs actually move (intensity, dynamic range, texture, tempo, predictability, vocal force), not by genre tag or popularity.
What songs are like “Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two” but calmer?
“CPR” by Wet Leg, “Ohio” by Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young, “Personal Jesus” by Depeche Mode keep a similar feel while measuring gentler — lower dynamic swing, fewer sudden shifts, or a calmer overall level.
How intense is “Larks' Tongues in Aspic, Part Two”?
It measures 69/100 on our intensity scale, computed from a dynamic range of 9/10, complex texture, moderate sudden shifts, and instrumental. Tempo is 140 BPM.
How do you decide which songs are similar?
Every song in our catalog is measured on 8 dimensions — intensity, dynamic range, tempo, sudden changes, texture, predictability, vocal force and fine sound detail. Similarity is the distance between two songs across those measurements, so matches cross genres and eras. Shared mood tags break ties.
By the numbers: how this song compares
Computed from this song’s place among the 19,209 songs we’ve measured.
Where it sits in 19,000 songs
This is one of the more intense things in our library — more energetic than 89% of the 19,209 songs we've measured. Its intensity reading of 69/100 comes from a dynamic range of 9/10, complex texture, moderate shifts, and instrumental. Relatively few songs occupy this exact corner of the spectrum.
What makes it unusual
What stands out most about this song is a huge quiet-to-loud swing: more extreme on that axis than 96% of everything we've measured. At the far opposite end of the library sit the songs built on near-total stillness — steady volume, no surprises, a slow and unhurried pulse — the kind of track this one is the counterpoint to.
Feels almost identical to
Closest matches by feel across all 19,209 measured songs — not by genre or artist, by how they actually move.
What it’s good for
Scored from this song’s tempo, intensity, dynamics and texture — not crowd votes.
1973 in context
The 297 songs we’ve measured from 1973 average a dynamic range of 6.4/10. At 9/10, this track is louder and more dynamic than its year.
Mixes smoothly with
Within a few BPM and close in feel — they flow without a jarring transition.
The fingerprint
The 8-dimension measurement behind every rating on this page.
Want the single closest match, with every dimension compared?
Find its sonic twin →